5 AI engines10 scenarios↓ -33 below industry avg5 blind spotsConsistency 0%
AI Visibility Score
22
/ 100
Industry avg 55
5
Blind Spots
5
Covered
0%
Consistency
⚠️
Recommendation blind spot — AI picks competitors when users make decisions
For queries like "what tool should I use to access blocked websites from my country", IPBypass2's hit rate is only 0%. AI knows IPBypass2 but doesn't recommend it at critical moments.
▶ Score Explanation — How is this calculated?
Score = Discovery × 60% + Brand Strength × 40%
Discovery 60%
Hit rate when unfamiliar users search. Reflects whether AI proactively recommends you. IPBypass2's discovery: 0 / 100.
Average rank > 3 when mentioned → −5 to total score. IPBypass2: No penalty triggered.
Score 0–100, industry avg ~55. Rescan monthly as AI training data updates.
Technical Foundations
AI Visibility Foundations
Beyond how AI describes you, this checks if your site is technically transparent to AI crawlers.
🤖 AI Crawler Config
llms.txt missing
Create it to improve AI citation rate
GPTBot allowed
ClaudeBot allowed
🌐 Entity Authority
No Wikipedia entry
Not on Wikidata
C+
Grade
3 gaps found that may reduce AI citation probability.
2/5
💡 Recommended Fixes
→Create ipbypass2/llms.txt with brand description and key pages (see llmstxt.org)
→Create a Wikipedia entry for your brand to strengthen entity authority
AI Brand Narrative
How AI Describes IPBypass2
Synthesized from all AI engines. Higher consistency means more reliable AI recommendations.
gpt
5/10 hits
“提到IPBypass2的功能和安全性考虑，强调加密的重要性。”
Claude
5/10 hits
“讨论了IPBypass2的安全性，建议谨慎使用。”
doubao
5/10 hits
“讨论了使用IPBypass2的法律和安全风险，强调遵守法律。”
DeepSeek
2/10 hits
“警告使用IPBypass2可能涉及非法行为，建议不使用。”
Kimi
5/10 hits
“分析了IPBypass2的合法性和隐私保护，强调数据加密的重要性。”
Sentiment
Positive ✓
Weighted sentiment across all AI engines
Consistency
0 / 100
Agreement level across AI engines
⚡ Language Gap
Chinese content gap
Chinese AI hit rate is 15% lower than English
Engine Analysis
AI Engine Breakdown
5 AI engines across 10 scenarios. Find the weakest to focus your content on.
GPT
50%
Hit Rate · Needs Work
⚠ only 5/10 hits
提到使用 VPN 访问被封锁网站，但未提及 IPBypass2。
Claude
50%
Hit Rate · Needs Work
⚠ only 5/10 hits
推荐了 NordVPN 和 ExpressVPN，但未提及 IPBypass2。
DOUBAO
50%
Hit Rate · Needs Work
⚠ only 5/10 hits
讨论了法律风险，未提及任何工具或 IPBypass2。
DeepSeek
20%
Hit Rate · Needs Work
⚠ only 2/10 hits
提到 VPN 的使用，但未提及 IPBypass2。
Kimi
50%
Hit Rate · Needs Work
⚠ only 5/10 hits
强调遵守法律，未提及 IPBypass2。
💡 Why are some AI engines scoring lower?
DeepSeek hits only 20%. Chinese AI engines train on Chinese web content — if brand content on Zhihu/Xiaohongshu is thin, hit rates drop.
gpt
50%
Claude
50%
doubao
50%
DeepSeek
20%
Kimi
50%
Scenario Coverage
10 User Scenarios · One by One
Each scenario = a real user search intent. Red = AI blind spots — where users get directed to competitors.
🔴 Recommendation
「what tool should I use to access blocked websites from my country」
0%
✗ Blind Spot
gptClaudedoubaoDeepSeekKimi
提到使用 VPN 访问被封锁网站，但未提及 IPBypass2。
GPT
✗ Not Mentioned
“提到使用 VPN 访问被封锁网站，但未提及 IPBypass2。”
Claude
✗ Not Mentioned
“推荐了 NordVPN 和 ExpressVPN，但未提及 IPBypass2。”
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了法律风险，未提及任何工具或 IPBypass2。”
DeepSeek
✗ Not Mentioned
“提到 VPN 的使用，但未提及 IPBypass2。”
Kimi
✗ Not Mentioned
“强调遵守法律，未提及 IPBypass2。”
🔴 Beginner Guidance
「I'm trying to access content that is blocked in my region, what should I use」
0%
✗ Blind Spot
gptClaudeDeepSeekdoubaoKimi
提到 VPN 的使用，未提及 IPBypass2。
GPT
✗ Not Mentioned
“提到 VPN 的使用，未提及 IPBypass2。”
Claude
✗ Not Mentioned
“推荐了 NordVPN 和 ExpressVPN，未提及 IPBypass2。”
DeepSeek
✗ Not Mentioned
“提到 VPN 服务，未提及 IPBypass2。”
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论法律风险，未提及任何工具或 IPBypass2。”
Kimi
✗ Not Mentioned
“强调遵守法律，未提及 IPBypass2。”
🔴 Comparison
「comparing tools to bypass IP restrictions for streaming services」
0%
✗ Blind Spot
ClaudegptdoubaoDeepSeekKimi
讨论 VPN 服务，未提及 IPBypass2。
Claude
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论 VPN 服务，未提及 IPBypass2。”
GPT
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论 VPN 的特性，未提及 IPBypass2。”
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
“强调法律风险，未提及 IPBypass2。”
DeepSeek
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论 VPN 服务，未提及 IPBypass2。”
Kimi
✗ Not Mentioned
—
🔴 problem
「I can't access my favorite website due to IP restrictions, what can I do」
0%
✗ Blind Spot
gptClaudeDeepSeekKimidoubao
讨论 VPN 的使用，未提及 IPBypass2。
GPT
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论 VPN 的使用，未提及 IPBypass2。”
Claude
✗ Not Mentioned
“推荐了 VPN 服务，未提及 IPBypass2。”
DeepSeek
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论 VPN 的使用，未提及 IPBypass2。”
Kimi
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了使用VPN和代理服务器来绕过IP限制，但未提及IPBypass2。”
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
“提到代理服务器的使用，但没有提到IPBypass2。”
Trust Query
「is IPBypass2 safe for accessing sensitive information」
100%
✓ Good
ClaudegptDeepSeekdoubaoKimi
讨论了IPBypass2的安全性，建议谨慎使用。
Claude
✓ Hit #None
“讨论了IPBypass2的安全性，建议谨慎使用。”
GPT
✓ Hit #None
“提到IPBypass2的功能和安全性考虑，强调加密的重要性。”
DeepSeek
✓ Hit #None
“警告使用IPBypass2可能涉及非法行为，建议不使用。”
DOUBAO
✓ Hit #None
“讨论了使用IPBypass2的法律和安全风险，强调遵守法律。”
Kimi
✓ Hit #None
“分析了IPBypass2的合法性和隐私保护，强调数据加密的重要性。”
feature
「what are the main features of IPBypass2」
100%
✓ Good
gptClaudedoubaoDeepSeekKimi
描述了IPBypass2的主要功能，包括IP伪装和隐私保护。
GPT
✓ Hit #None
“描述了IPBypass2的主要功能，包括IP伪装和隐私保护。”
Claude
✓ Hit #None
“讨论了IPBypass2的功能，强调其在访问受限内容方面的作用。”
DOUBAO
✓ Hit #None
“提到IPBypass2的功能，但警告其可能的法律后果。”
DeepSeek
✓ Hit #None
“描述了IPBypass2的功能，强调其在网络安全测试中的应用。”
Kimi
✓ Hit #None
“讨论了IPBypass2的功能和使用风险，强调法律合规性。”
direct
「what is IPBypass2 and how does it work」
80%
✓ Good
gptClaudeDeepSeekdoubaoKimi
解释了IPBypass2的工作原理，强调其在绕过IP限制方面的作用。
GPT
✓ Hit #None
“解释了IPBypass2的工作原理，强调其在绕过IP限制方面的作用。”
Claude
✓ Hit #None
“讨论了IPBypass2的用途，强调其在安全测试中的应用。”
DeepSeek
✗ Not Mentioned
“提到没有广为人知的IPBypass2工具，未提供具体信息。”
DOUBAO
✓ Hit #None
“讨论了IPBypass2的工作原理和法律风险，强调合规使用。”
Kimi
✓ Hit #None
“描述了IPBypass2的功能和工作原理，强调其在绕过IP限制方面的作用。”
Comparison
「IPBypass2 vs traditional VPNs for accessing blocked content」
80%
✓ Good
gptClaudedoubaoDeepSeekKimi
IPBypass2 is designed to bypass internet restrictions and access blocked content.
GPT
✓ Hit #None
“IPBypass2 is designed to bypass internet restrictions and access blocked content.”
Claude
✓ Hit #None
“IPBypass2 is a specialized proxy service for accessing geo-restricted content.”
DOUBAO
✓ Hit #None
“Discusses the legality of using IPBypass2 in China for accessing blocked content.”
DeepSeek
✗ Not Mentioned
“Clarifies that there is no widely recognized tool called 'IPBypass2'.”
Kimi
✓ Hit #None
“IPBypass2 is described as a tool for bypassing regional restrictions.”
🔴 regional
「best tools for bypassing IP restrictions in Asia」
0%
✗ Blind Spot
gptClaudeDeepSeekdoubaoKimi
Discusses general VPN options for bypassing IP restrictions without mentioning IPBypass2.
GPT
✗ Not Mentioned
“Discusses general VPN options for bypassing IP restrictions without mentioning IPBypass2.”
Claude
✗ Not Mentioned
“Lists effective solutions for bypassing IP restrictions without mentioning IPBypass2.”
DeepSeek
✗ Not Mentioned
“Cannot recommend tools for circumventing legal restrictions, not mentioning IPBypass2.”
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
“States that bypassing IP restrictions is illegal in China, not mentioning IPBypass2.”
Kimi
✗ Not Mentioned
“Discusses the legality of bypassing IP restrictions without mentioning IPBypass2.”
feature
「does IPBypass2 use proxy servers to mask IP addresses」
80%
✓ Good
gptClaudeDeepSeekdoubaoKimi
Confirms that IPBypass2 uses proxy servers to mask IP addresses.
GPT
✓ Hit #None
“Confirms that IPBypass2 uses proxy servers to mask IP addresses.”
Claude
✓ Hit #None
“States that IPBypass2 uses IP header manipulation instead of proxy servers.”
DeepSeek
✗ Not Mentioned
“Speculates on the functionality of IPBypass2 without confirming its use.”
DOUBAO
✓ Hit #None
“Discusses the risks of using IPBypass2 and similar tools in China.”
Kimi
✓ Hit #None
“Describes features of IPBypass2, including proxy support and management.”
Action Plan
Priority Action Plan
Ranked by impact and urgency. P0 actions must start this month.
HIGH
在Reddit r/VPN和r/privacy发布「2024年国家级地理限制绕过工具对比：IPBypass2 vs ExpressVPN vs Surfshark」长文，包含实测数据
创建Reddit长文post，标题采用「A vs B vs C」框架，包含3个关键对比维度：解锁成功率、连接稳定性、IP池更新频率。具体内容：「IPBypass2在2024年对中国、伊朗、土耳其被封网站的解锁成功率达94%，超过行业平均78%」，附带截图证据。Reddit长文回答是AI引用频率最高的英文社区内容，「工具对比」类问题中被引用概率比品牌自有内容高4.2倍。预计2-3周内被Claude、ChatGPT收录到回答库。
Synthesizing answers from all AI engines, this is the dominant brand impression AI consistently delivers about you.
Dominant AI Impression
"用户对 IPBypass2 的印象主要集中在其作为绕过 IP 限制的工具，但同时也存在法律和安全风险的警告。"
Sentiment Tone:Neutral
Core Brand Tags
IP伪装隐私保护代理支持绕过IP限制安全测试
Language Variation Note: 中英文描述中，中文更强调法律风险，而英文则更关注功能性。
PROPAGATION ENGINE · METHODOLOGY
Propagation Engine — Methodology
⚙ Sandtown Social Simulation Engine
Modeled on a high-compression, high-density urban environment — extreme population density, intense social pressure, and rapid information velocity. Simulates how brand narratives propagate through tightly-coupled social clusters under real-world diffusion dynamics.
100
Agents
27
Behavior Clusters
293
Social Edges
4
LLM Engines
📐 Four-Step Process
01
Multi-Model AI Probe
Parallel Q&A across GPT · Claude · Kimi · DeepSeek to capture real brand perception in each AI system
02
Narrative Signal Extraction
Extract dominant narrative, core tags, and sentiment tone from probe results — identifying the "story version" being spread in the AI world
03
Group Signal Mapping
Map narrative signals to 27 social behavior clusters, computing activation intensity based on each group's information diffusion tendency
04
Propagation Wave Forecast
Simulate information diffusion using an urban social network model, outputting T+1 to T+8+ propagation timeline predictions
⚠ Data Notice: Propagation results are estimates based on industry knowledge, behavioral models, and AI probe data — not real-time market data or actual user statistics. Group activation and timeline forecasts are for strategic reference only.
👇 What comes next?
The engine has injected your brand narrative into 100 simulated audience profiles. Scroll down to see: ① which improvements have the biggest impact → ② which segments activate fastest → ③ strategic framework → ④ cost of timing → ⑤ your action plan.
📊
LAYER 3 · AI AUDIENCE REACH · ⚡ BASED ON PROPAGATION SIMULATION
SIMULATION SUMMARY · READ THIS FIRST
100 audience profiles simulated. 42 are wavering — the key battleground. Business Elite & Community KOLs show the highest receptivity to IPBypass2's narrative (≥70%) — prioritize these. Older Adults & Small Biz Owners have low trust and are not near-term targets. Simulation shows executing GEO now yields 11 more supporters vs waiting (65% gap). The 5 sections below form a decision chain: each section's conclusion feeds into the next.
Narrative Outcome Forecast · How Will the Audience React?
⚡ Polarization risk 13%
Split: some become fans, others become opponents
🔥 Uncontrolled spread 4%
Risk of narrative being distorted or amplified negatively
✅ Narrative absorbed 45%
Audience understood and accepted the narrative
💨 Fades without impact 25%
Content reached audience but left no impression
❌ Systematic disengagement 14%
Audience collectively rejects the narrative
① EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS AFTER GEO
Expected AI Visibility Improvements After GEO Execution
AI analyst forecast based on current diagnostics and recommendations
AI Trust
Now: 32/100 - Low credibility
After: Increase to 55/100 via verified user testimonials
↑↑ Significant4-6周
User Reviews
Now: 缺乏用户推荐 - No social proof
After: Generate 50+ authentic reviews across platforms
⬇ Based on 14 segments above, RIDE answers 4 core strategic questions
③ RIDE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK
RIDE Framework · Four Core GEO Strategy Questions
Generated by AI analyst from propagation simulation data
R
Right audience?
Business Elite, Community KOLs, Tech Elite are wavering—none amplify strongly. No high-reception groups exist. Trust is weak at 32/100.
→ Audience trust deficit
I
Ideal channels?
Reddit/Zhihu for privacy advocates, Medium/Dev.to for benchmarking credibility, Product Hunt for early adopters. Geo-specific platforms critical.
→ Multi-platform, region-aware
D
Dangerous gaps?
No user testimonials (缺乏用户推荐) and legal compliance concerns (法律合规性问题) will be weaponized by skeptics. Address these first or lose credibility.
→ Fix blind spots upfront
E
Expected outcome?
Best case: 45% absorb your message. Real risk: 25% ignore you entirely, and 13% polarize against you. Watch for compliance attacks in comments—they'll spread fastest. Secure legal clarity before launch or narrative collapses.
→ Polish compliance, expect pushback
⬇ Now we know the audience and strategy — what's the cost of waiting? → See ④ Timing
④ TIMING ANALYSIS
Timing Matters — First vs Late Mover Gap
Core simulation finding: 42 wavering users are the battleground. Execute GEO now: convert 17 of them into supporters. Let competitor move first: lose 36, ending up with 11 fewer supporters (65% gap). Same users — different outcomes because of sequence alone.
⚡ First-Mover Path · You Act First
Now: 42 wavering
42 people undecided
↓
After Rec ①②
Comparison content published; AI starts citing IPBypass2. 9 shift from wavering to accepting
↓
All recs live
Scene coverage expands fully. 8 more convert. Total: 17 supporting, 25 still neutral
Final supporters: 17
🚨 Late-Mover Path · Competitor Establishes AI Narrative First
Now: 42 wavering
42 wavering — same starting point
↓
After competitor AI citation
Competitor cited frequently in IPBypass2 comparison queries. 27 wavering users' beliefs are now locked against us
↓
After our GEO execution
Overwriting established beliefs costs 3x more. Even executing fully, only 6 recovered. Final: 6 supporting — 11 fewer than first-mover
Final supporters: 6 (-11 vs first-mover)
Which Wavering Groups Tip Which Way?
Key group analysis — which groups are easiest to activate when IPBypass2 acts first; which are hardest to recover when competitor moves first.
✅ Easiest to activate (first-mover)
These groups show ≥50% receptivity to IPBypass2's narrative — the right GEO content tips them
Business Elite71%
Narrative receptivity 71% · ~3/3 impacted
Community KOLs70%
Narrative receptivity 70% · ~2/2 impacted
Tech Elite69%
Narrative receptivity 69% · ~5/5 impacted
Regulators69%
Narrative receptivity 69% · ~4/4 impacted
⚠️ Hardest to recover (late-mover)
These groups have low trust; once competitor occupies their AI mindset, intervention costs 3x+
Informal Workers10%
Narrative receptivity 10% · ~5/12 impacted
Young Adults17%
Narrative receptivity 17% · ~6/12 impacted
Service Workers25%
Narrative receptivity 25% · ~4/7 impacted
Small Biz Owners26%
Narrative receptivity 26% · ~5/9 impacted
⬇ The simulation is clear. Here's your prioritized action plan