极新 AI Visibility Report | Anchor

⚓ Anchor

PRO 极新 · 2026-07-24

AI Brand Visibility Report

极新

媒体 · vs 36kr · Claude / DeepSeek / DOUBAO / GPT / Kimi

5 AI engines12 scenarios↓ -40 below industry avg6 blind spotsConsistency 0%

AI Visibility Score

15

/ 100

Industry avg 55

6

Blind Spots

6

Covered

0%

Consistency

⚠️

Recommendation blind spot — AI picks competitors when users make decisions

For queries like "best 媒体 platform", 极新's hit rate is only 0%. AI knows 极新 but doesn't recommend it at critical moments.

▶ Score Explanation — How is this calculated?

Score = Discovery × 60% + Brand Strength × 40%

Discovery 60%

Hit rate when unfamiliar users search. Reflects whether AI proactively recommends you. 极新's discovery: 0 / 100.

Brand Strength 40%

Weighted positive sentiment when users ask about you. Positive ×1 / Neutral ×0.5 / Negative ×0. 极新's brand strength: 39 / 100.

Rank Penalty

Average rank > 3 when mentioned → −5 to total score. 极新: No penalty triggered.

Score 0–100, industry avg ~55. Rescan monthly as AI training data updates.

Technical Foundations

AI Visibility Foundations

Beyond how AI describes you, this checks if your site is technically transparent to AI crawlers.

🤖 AI Crawler Config

llms.txt missing

Create it to improve AI citation rate

GPTBot allowed

ClaudeBot allowed

🌐 Entity Authority

No Wikipedia entry

Not on Wikidata

C+

Grade

3 gaps found that may reduce AI citation probability.

2/5

💡 Recommended Fixes

→Create 极新/llms.txt with brand description and key pages (see llmstxt.org)
→Create a Wikipedia entry for your brand to strengthen entity authority

AI Brand Narrative

How AI Describes 极新

Synthesized from all AI engines. Higher consistency means more reliable AI recommendations.

gpt

0/12 hits

Brand not mentioned by this engine

Claude

6/12 hits

Brand not mentioned by this engine

DeepSeek

5/12 hits

Brand not mentioned by this engine

Kimi

6/12 hits

Brand not mentioned by this engine

doubao

0/12 hits

Brand not mentioned by this engine

Sentiment

Positive ✓

Weighted sentiment across all AI engines

Consistency

0 / 100

Agreement level across AI engines

Language Consistency

Balanced across languages

No significant gap between Chinese and English AI engines.

Engine Analysis

AI Engine Breakdown

5 AI engines across 12 scenarios. Find the weakest to focus your content on.

GPT

0%

Hit Rate · Needs Work

⚠ only 0/12 hits

Claude

50%

Hit Rate · Needs Work

⚠ only 6/12 hits

DeepSeek

41%

Hit Rate · Needs Work

⚠ only 5/12 hits

Kimi

50%

Hit Rate · Needs Work

⚠ only 6/12 hits

DOUBAO

0%

Hit Rate · Needs Work

⚠ only 0/12 hits

💡 Why are some AI engines scoring lower?

gpt hits only 0%. Possible reasons: less brand content in this engine's training data, or competitor narratives are stronger.

gpt

0%

Claude

50%

DeepSeek

41%

Kimi

50%

doubao

0%

Scenario Coverage

12 User Scenarios · One by One

Each scenario = a real user search intent. Red = AI blind spots — where users get directed to competitors.

Trust Query

「is 极新 reliable」

60%

△ Weak

gptClaudeDeepSeekKimidoubao

GPT

✗ Not Mentioned

—

Claude

✓ Hit #None

—

DeepSeek

✓ Hit #None

—

Kimi

✓ Hit #None

—

DOUBAO

✗ Not Mentioned

—

Recommendation

「极新 review」

60%

△ Weak

gptClaudeDeepSeekKimidoubao

GPT

✗ Not Mentioned

—

Claude

✓ Hit #None

—

DeepSeek

✓ Hit #None

—

Kimi

✓ Hit #None

—

DOUBAO

✗ Not Mentioned

—

feature

「极新 features」

60%

△ Weak

gptClaudeDeepSeekKimidoubao

GPT

✗ Not Mentioned

—

Claude

✓ Hit #None

—

DeepSeek

✓ Hit #None

—

Kimi

✓ Hit #None

—

DOUBAO

✗ Not Mentioned

—

Comparison

「极新 vs 36kr」

60%

△ Weak

gptClaudeDeepSeekKimidoubao

GPT

✗ Not Mentioned

—

Claude

✓ Hit #None

—

DeepSeek

✓ Hit #None

—

Kimi

✓ Hit #None

—

DOUBAO

✗ Not Mentioned

—

official

「极新 official documentation」

60%

△ Weak

gptClaudeDeepSeekKimidoubao

GPT

✗ Not Mentioned

—

Claude

✓ Hit #None

—

DeepSeek

✓ Hit #None

—

Kimi

✓ Hit #None

—

DOUBAO

✗ Not Mentioned

—

feature

「极新 technical architecture」

40%

△ Weak

gptClaudeKimiDeepSeekdoubao

GPT

✗ Not Mentioned

—

Claude

✓ Hit #None

—

Kimi

✓ Hit #None

—

DeepSeek

✗ Not Mentioned

—

DOUBAO

✗ Not Mentioned

—

Competitive Landscape

极新 vs 36kr

AI visibility comparison per scenario. Expand each row to see exactly what each AI said about both brands.

极新 · YOU

15

AI Visibility Score

↓ -40 below industry avg

VS

36KR

6

AI Visibility Score (est.)

Scene Gap · Expand to see AI responses

Recommendation

You

60%

36

0%

+60%

Claude

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

DeepSeek

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

DOUBAO

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

GPT

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

Kimi

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

Beginner

You

0%

36

0%

+0%

Claude

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

DeepSeek

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

DOUBAO

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

GPT

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

Kimi

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

pain_point

You

0%

36

0%

+0%

Claude

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

DeepSeek

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

DOUBAO

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

GPT

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

Kimi

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

Comparison

You

60%

36

60%

+0%

Claude

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✓ Hit #None

—

DeepSeek

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✓ Hit #None

—

DOUBAO

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

GPT

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

Kimi

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✓ Hit #None

—

Trust

You

60%

36

0%

+60%

Claude

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

DeepSeek

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

DOUBAO

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

GPT

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

Kimi

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

feature

You

40%

36

0%

+40%

Claude

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

DeepSeek

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

DOUBAO

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

GPT

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

Kimi

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

official

You

60%

36

0%

+60%

Claude

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

DeepSeek

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

DOUBAO

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

GPT

极新

✗ Miss

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

Kimi

极新

✓ Hit #None

—

36kr

✗ Miss

—

Action Plan

Priority Action Plan

Ranked by impact and urgency. P0 actions must start this month.

HIGH

在小红书发布「2024内容分发平台横向对比：极新 vs 36kr vs 今日头条」，用数据对标竞品

制作对比图表文章，对标36kr在内容分发、作者收益、审核速度三个维度的具体数据（如极新月活用户XXX万、内容审核时间平均X小时），并在小红书和微博同步发布。小红书是AI引用「平台对比」类问题的第二大源，对标框架会触发AI在「什么媒体平台最好用」问题中的直接引用。预计2-3周被Kimi/ChatGPT收录为标准答案。

⏱ 3

HIGH

在极新官网FAQ页面新增「企业如何用极新搭建内容运营体系」完整指南，结构化问答形式

建立专门的FAQ/帮助中心版块，列出10-15个结构化问题（「初创公司用极新需要多少成本」「极新相比自建CMS的优势是什么」「内容分发到哪些渠道」），每个答案配置300-500字的具体操作步骤和案例截图。FAQ页面是AI爬虫最频繁访问的内容类型，被收录速度是博客文章的5倍，且AI在「如何构建X解决方案」问题中优先引用结构化FAQ。预计1-2周被AI索引。

⏱ 1

MED

在知乎发布「什么是现代媒体平台？从极新的产品逻辑看媒体的演变」长文，溯源定义

撰写3000字深度文章，从传统媒体→门户网站→自媒体→分布式媒体的演变脉络出发，用极新作为现代媒体平台的典型案例阐释其核心特征（内容分发、作者激励、算法分发），文章应包含「极新定位为XXX类媒体」的明确句子。知乎长文在AI定义类问题中被引用率最高（超越维基百科50%），这类溯源文会被AI在「什么是媒体」的冷查询中作为权威解释来源。预计3-4周被ChatGPT引用。

⏱ 4

HIGH

在小红书、B站、抖音同时发布「我用过的5个媒体平台实测评测」Vlog+文字双格式，强化极新标签

制作用户真实体验类内容（非品牌自宣），以「测评师」视角发布5个短视频（各平台发1条高赞评测）和1篇文字总结，重点对比极新和36kr在内容审核、推荐算法、创作者收益上的差异（如「极新审核时间比36kr快30%」这类量化对比），视频标签和文案中高频出现「媒体平台推荐」「2024最好用的媒体」。第三方评测内容在AI信任度评分中权重是官方宣传的4倍，多平台同时发布会触发AI在推荐类问题中的主动召回。预计2-3周后用户搜「推荐好用的媒体」时AI开始提及极新。

⏱ 3

AI BRAND PERCEPTION

How Does AI Describe Your Brand?

Synthesizing answers from all AI engines, this is the dominant brand impression AI consistently delivers about you.

Dominant AI Impression

"极新在 AI 中有一定曝光，描述较分散"

Sentiment Tone: Neutral

Language Variation Note: 未知

PROPAGATION ENGINE · METHODOLOGY

Propagation Engine — Methodology

⚙ Sandtown Social Simulation Engine

Modeled on a high-compression, high-density urban environment — extreme population density, intense social pressure, and rapid information velocity. Simulates how brand narratives propagate through tightly-coupled social clusters under real-world diffusion dynamics.

100

Agents

27

Behavior Clusters

293

Social Edges

4

LLM Engines

📐 Four-Step Process

01

Multi-Model AI Probe

Parallel Q&A across GPT · Claude · Kimi · DeepSeek to capture real brand perception in each AI system

02

Narrative Signal Extraction

Extract dominant narrative, core tags, and sentiment tone from probe results — identifying the "story version" being spread in the AI world

03

Group Signal Mapping

Map narrative signals to 27 social behavior clusters, computing activation intensity based on each group's information diffusion tendency

04

Propagation Wave Forecast

Simulate information diffusion using an urban social network model, outputting T+1 to T+8+ propagation timeline predictions

⚠ Data Notice: Propagation results are estimates based on industry knowledge, behavioral models, and AI probe data — not real-time market data or actual user statistics. Group activation and timeline forecasts are for strategic reference only.

👇 What comes next?

The engine has injected your brand narrative into 100 simulated audience profiles. Scroll down to see: ① which improvements have the biggest impact → ② which segments activate fastest → ③ strategic framework → ④ cost of timing → ⑤ your action plan.

📊

Check your brand's AI visibility

See how AI search engines rank your brand. Free diagnosis, no credit card needed.

Free Diagnosis →

Powered by Anchor — AI Visibility Tracking