backend as a service · vs Firebase · Claude / DeepSeek / DOUBAO / GPT / Kimi
5 AI engines10 scenarios↓ -8 below industry avg4 blind spotsConsistency 0%
AI Visibility Score
47
/ 100
Industry avg 55
4
Blind Spots
6
Covered
0%
Consistency
⚠️
Comparison blind spot — AI picks competitors when users make decisions
For queries like "comparing backend services for a new web application project", Supabase's hit rate is only 0%. AI knows Supabase but doesn't recommend it at critical moments.
▶ Score Explanation — How is this calculated?
Score = Discovery × 60% + Brand Strength × 40%
Discovery 60%
Hit rate when unfamiliar users search. Reflects whether AI proactively recommends you. Supabase's discovery: 15 / 100.
Average rank > 3 when mentioned → −5 to total score. Supabase: No penalty triggered.
Score 0–100, industry avg ~55. Rescan monthly as AI training data updates.
Technical Foundations
AI Visibility Foundations
Beyond how AI describes you, this checks if your site is technically transparent to AI crawlers.
🤖 AI Crawler Config
llms.txt missing
Create it to improve AI citation rate
GPTBot allowed
ClaudeBot allowed
🌐 Entity Authority
No Wikipedia entry
Wikidata entity found
B
Grade
2 gaps found that may reduce AI citation probability.
3/5
💡 Recommended Fixes
→Create supabase/llms.txt with brand description and key pages (see llmstxt.org)
→Create a Wikipedia entry for your brand to strengthen entity authority
AI Brand Narrative
How AI Describes Supabase
Synthesized from all AI engines. Higher consistency means more reliable AI recommendations.
DeepSeek
7/10 hits
“提到 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。”
Claude
7/10 hits
“强烈推荐 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。”
gpt
5/10 hits
“Supabase被认为是处理用户身份验证和数据存储的可靠选项。”
Kimi
5/10 hits
“Supabase被认为在用户身份验证和数据存储方面可靠，适合快速构建应用。”
Sentiment
Positive ✓
Weighted sentiment across all AI engines
Consistency
0 / 100
Agreement level across AI engines
Language Consistency
Balanced across languages
No significant gap between Chinese and English AI engines.
Engine Analysis
AI Engine Breakdown
5 AI engines across 10 scenarios. Find the weakest to focus your content on.
GPT
50%
Hit Rate · Needs Work
⚠ only 5/10 hits
讨论了 Firebase 作为后端服务的选项。
Kimi
50%
Hit Rate · Needs Work
⚠ only 5/10 hits
提到 Firebase 作为后端服务的选项。
Claude
70%
Hit Rate
✓ 7/10 scenarios hit
讨论了 Firebase 的特点和优势。
DeepSeek
70%
Hit Rate
✓ 7/10 scenarios hit
提到 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。
DOUBAO
10%
Hit Rate · Needs Work
⚠ only 1/10 hits
讨论了 Firebase Firestore 的特点。
💡 Why are some AI engines scoring lower?
doubao hits only 10%. Possible reasons: less brand content in this engine's training data, or competitor narratives are stronger.
gpt
50%
Kimi
50%
Claude
70%
DeepSeek
70%
doubao
10%
Scenario Coverage
10 User Scenarios · One by One
Each scenario = a real user search intent. Red = AI blind spots — where users get directed to competitors.
🔴 Recommendation
「what tool should a small startup use for backend services」
20%
✗ Blind Spot
gptKimiClaudeDeepSeekdoubao
提到 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。
GPT
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了 Firebase 作为后端服务的选项。”
Kimi
✗ Not Mentioned
“提到 Firebase 作为后端服务的选项。”
Claude
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了 Firebase 的特点和优势。”
DeepSeek
✓ Hit #1
“提到 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。”
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
—
Beginner Guidance
「I'm a developer looking for an easy way to set up a database and authentication, what do you suggest」
40%
△ Weak
gptKimiClaudedoubaoDeepSeek
强烈推荐 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。
GPT
✗ Not Mentioned
“提到 Firebase 作为数据库和身份验证的选项。”
Kimi
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了 Firebase 的数据库和身份验证功能。”
Claude
✓ Hit #1
“强烈推荐 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。”
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了 Firebase Firestore 的特点。”
DeepSeek
✓ Hit #1
“提到 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。”
🔴 Comparison
「comparing backend services for a new web application project」
0%
✗ Blind Spot
gptKimiClaudedoubaoDeepSeek
讨论了 Firebase 作为后端服务的选项。
GPT
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了 Firebase 作为后端服务的选项。”
Kimi
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了比较后端服务的因素。”
Claude
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了 Firebase 的特点和优势。”
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了比较后端服务的因素。”
DeepSeek
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了选择后端服务的决策。”
🔴 problem
「our team needs a backend solution but we lack database expertise, what should we use」
20%
✗ Blind Spot
gptKimiClaudedoubaoDeepSeek
推荐 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。
GPT
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了 Firebase 作为后端服务的选项。”
Kimi
✗ Not Mentioned
“讨论了 Firebase 作为后端服务的选项。”
Claude
✓ Hit #1
“推荐 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。”
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
“回答讨论了Firebase作为后端解决方案，但未提及Supabase。”
DeepSeek
✗ Not Mentioned
“回答讨论了Firebase作为后端解决方案，但未提及Supabase。”
Trust Query
「is Supabase reliable for handling user authentication and data storage」
100%
✓ Good
gptKimiClaudedoubaoDeepSeek
Supabase被认为是处理用户身份验证和数据存储的可靠选项。
GPT
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase被认为是处理用户身份验证和数据存储的可靠选项。”
Kimi
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase被认为在用户身份验证和数据存储方面可靠，适合快速构建应用。”
Claude
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase在用户身份验证和数据存储方面被认为是可靠的。”
DOUBAO
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase被认为在用户身份验证和数据存储方面可靠，支持多种认证方式。”
DeepSeek
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase被认为在用户身份验证和数据存储方面可靠，适合小型应用。”
feature
「what features does Supabase offer for building applications」
80%
✓ Good
gptKimiClaudeDeepSeekdoubao
Supabase是一个开源的后端服务平台，提供多种功能帮助开发者快速构建应用。
GPT
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase是一个开源的后端服务平台，提供多种功能帮助开发者快速构建应用。”
Kimi
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase是Firebase的开源替代品，提供多种功能帮助开发者构建应用。”
Claude
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase提供全面的后端服务，支持快速构建应用。”
DeepSeek
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase是一个开源的后端服务平台，提供多种功能帮助开发者构建应用。”
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
—
direct
「what is Supabase and what are its main features」
80%
✓ Good
doubaogptKimiClaudeDeepSeek
Supabase是一个开源的后端服务平台，提供快速构建应用的工具。
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
—
GPT
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase是一个开源的后端服务平台，提供快速构建应用的工具。”
Kimi
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase是Firebase的开源替代品，提供多种功能帮助开发者构建应用。”
Claude
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase是一个开源的后端服务平台，提供完整的后端基础设施。”
DeepSeek
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase是一个开源的后端服务平台，提供全面的后端服务。”
Comparison
「Supabase vs Firebase for a project requiring real-time data」
60%
△ Weak
doubaogptKimiClaudeDeepSeek
Supabase和Firebase都是处理实时数据的优秀选择，具有不同特点。
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
—
GPT
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase和Firebase都是处理实时数据的优秀选择，具有不同特点。”
Kimi
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase is an open-source alternative to Firebase, suitable for real-time data projects.”
Claude
✗ Not Mentioned
“The response focuses on Firebase's strengths without discussing Supabase.”
DeepSeek
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase and Firebase are compared, highlighting their different architectures.”
🔴 regional
「best backend services for startups in Asia」
20%
✗ Blind Spot
doubaogptKimiClaudeDeepSeek
Supabase is highlighted as a great open-source option for startups in Asia.
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
—
GPT
✗ Not Mentioned
“The response discusses Firebase without mentioning Supabase.”
Kimi
✗ Not Mentioned
“The response lists AWS and does not mention Supabase.”
Claude
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase is highlighted as a great open-source option for startups in Asia.”
DeepSeek
✗ Not Mentioned
“The response categorizes backend services without mentioning Supabase.”
feature
「does Supabase support real-time subscriptions and how does it work」
80%
✓ Good
doubaogptKimiClaudeDeepSeek
Supabase supports real-time subscriptions using PostgreSQL's logical replication.
DOUBAO
✗ Not Mentioned
—
GPT
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase supports real-time subscriptions using PostgreSQL's logical replication.”
Kimi
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase provides real-time subscriptions, allowing immediate updates from the database.”
Claude
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase has robust real-time subscription capabilities using PostgreSQL.”
DeepSeek
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase fully supports real-time subscriptions through its Realtime Server.”
Competitive Landscape
Supabase vs Firebase
AI visibility comparison per scenario. Expand each row to see exactly what each AI said about both brands.
SUPABASE · YOU
47
AI Visibility Score
↓ -8 below industry avg
VS
FIREBASE
34
AI Visibility Score (est.)
Scene Gap · Expand to see AI responses
Recommendation
You
20%
Fi
60%
-40%
Claude
Supabase
✗ Miss
“讨论了 Firebase 的特点和优势。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Firebase is best for MVP development and real-time apps with a generous free tier.”
DeepSeek
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“提到 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“Discusses backend options but does not mention Firebase.”
DOUBAO
Supabase
✗ Miss
—
Firebase
✗ Miss
—
GPT
Supabase
✗ Miss
“讨论了 Firebase 作为后端服务的选项。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Firebase is a comprehensive platform by Google offering various backend services.”
Kimi
Supabase
✗ Miss
“提到 Firebase 作为后端服务的选项。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Firebase is a platform developed by Google for creating mobile and web applications.”
Beginner
You
40%
Fi
40%
+0%
Claude
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“强烈推荐 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“Focuses on Supabase as an alternative to Firebase, not mentioning Firebase itself.”
DeepSeek
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“提到 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“Discusses Supabase without mentioning Firebase.”
DOUBAO
Supabase
✗ Miss
“讨论了 Firebase Firestore 的特点。”
Firebase
✗ Miss
—
GPT
Supabase
✗ Miss
“提到 Firebase 作为数据库和身份验证的选项。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Firebase offers Firestore and Realtime Database for easy database setup.”
Kimi
Supabase
✗ Miss
“讨论了 Firebase 的数据库和身份验证功能。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Firebase provides built-in authentication and database options.”
Comparison
You
60%
Fi
80%
-20%
Claude
Supabase
✗ Miss
“The response focuses on Firebase's strengths without discussing Supabase.”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Firebase's real-time features are compared with Supabase.”
DeepSeek
Supabase
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase and Firebase are compared, highlighting their different architectures.”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Firebase is discussed in detail while comparing it with Supabase.”
DOUBAO
Supabase
✗ Miss
—
Firebase
✗ Miss
—
GPT
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase和Firebase都是处理实时数据的优秀选择，具有不同特点。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Comparison of Supabase and Firebase for real-time data projects.”
Kimi
Supabase
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase is an open-source alternative to Firebase, suitable for real-time data projects.”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Firebase is discussed in the context of comparing it with Supabase.”
problem
You
20%
Fi
40%
-20%
Claude
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“推荐 Supabase 作为开源 Firebase 替代品。”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“Focuses on Supabase without mentioning Firebase.”
DeepSeek
Supabase
✗ Miss
“回答讨论了Firebase作为后端解决方案，但未提及Supabase。”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“Discusses BaaS platforms without mentioning Firebase.”
DOUBAO
Supabase
✗ Miss
“回答讨论了Firebase作为后端解决方案，但未提及Supabase。”
Firebase
✗ Miss
—
GPT
Supabase
✗ Miss
“讨论了 Firebase 作为后端服务的选项。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Firebase offers a real-time NoSQL database and is suitable for teams lacking expertise.”
Kimi
Supabase
✗ Miss
“讨论了 Firebase 作为后端服务的选项。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Firebase is popular for its ease of use and comprehensive tools.”
Trust
You
100%
Fi
20%
+80%
Claude
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase在用户身份验证和数据存储方面被认为是可靠的。”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“Discusses Supabase's reliability without mentioning Firebase.”
DeepSeek
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase被认为在用户身份验证和数据存储方面可靠，适合小型应用。”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“Focuses on Supabase's reliability without mentioning Firebase.”
DOUBAO
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase被认为在用户身份验证和数据存储方面可靠，支持多种认证方式。”
Firebase
✗ Miss
—
GPT
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase被认为是处理用户身份验证和数据存储的可靠选项。”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“Focuses on Supabase's reliability without mentioning Firebase.”
Kimi
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase被认为在用户身份验证和数据存储方面可靠，适合快速构建应用。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase is an alternative to Firebase, providing backend services.”
feature
You
80%
Fi
0%
+80%
Claude
Supabase
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase has robust real-time subscription capabilities using PostgreSQL.”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“Supabase is discussed without mentioning Firebase.”
DeepSeek
Supabase
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase fully supports real-time subscriptions through its Realtime Server.”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“Supabase is discussed without mentioning Firebase.”
DOUBAO
Supabase
✗ Miss
—
Firebase
✗ Miss
—
GPT
Supabase
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase supports real-time subscriptions using PostgreSQL's logical replication.”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“Supabase is discussed without mentioning Firebase.”
Kimi
Supabase
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase provides real-time subscriptions, allowing immediate updates from the database.”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“Supabase is discussed without mentioning Firebase.”
direct
You
80%
Fi
80%
+0%
Claude
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase是一个开源的后端服务平台，提供完整的后端基础设施。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase is described as an open-source Firebase alternative.”
DeepSeek
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase是一个开源的后端服务平台，提供全面的后端服务。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase is referred to as an alternative to Firebase.”
DOUBAO
Supabase
✗ Miss
—
Firebase
✗ Miss
—
GPT
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase是一个开源的后端服务平台，提供快速构建应用的工具。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase is described as an alternative to Firebase with a focus on SQL databases.”
Kimi
Supabase
✓ Hit #1
“Supabase是Firebase的开源替代品，提供多种功能帮助开发者构建应用。”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase is mentioned as an open-source alternative to Firebase.”
regional
You
20%
Fi
20%
+0%
Claude
Supabase
✓ Hit #None
“Supabase is highlighted as a great open-source option for startups in Asia.”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“AWS is discussed without mentioning Firebase.”
DeepSeek
Supabase
✗ Miss
“The response categorizes backend services without mentioning Supabase.”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“No mention of Firebase, focusing on backend services.”
DOUBAO
Supabase
✗ Miss
—
Firebase
✗ Miss
—
GPT
Supabase
✗ Miss
“The response discusses Firebase without mentioning Supabase.”
Firebase
✓ Hit #None
“Firebase is listed as a backend service for startups in Asia.”
Kimi
Supabase
✗ Miss
“The response lists AWS and does not mention Supabase.”
Firebase
✗ Miss
“AWS is discussed without mentioning Firebase.”
Action Plan
Priority Action Plan
Ranked by impact and urgency. P0 actions must start this month.
HIGH
在小红书/微博发布「3个初创团队的BaaS选型案例：Supabase vs Firebase vs Appwrite」，包含成本对比和上线时间数据
创建包含真实案例的对比文章，列出Supabase相比Firebase的具体优势数据（如「Supabase开源基础架构节省40%基础设施成本」「初创团队从零到数据库认证部署仅需2小时vs Firebase需4小时」）。小红书/微博的初创创业话题讨论被AI抓取作为「初创公司工具推荐」的直接证据，「A vs B 包含具体数字」的格式被引用频率比单品介绍高3.5倍。在初创团队、DevOps、创业标签下发布，预计2-3周被Kimi/Claude的初创工具知识库收录。
在Dev.to/hashnode发布「2024年BaaS对比评测：Supabase vs Firebase vs AWS Amplify（可扩展性/定价/开发速度/冷启动时间）」
制作详细对比表格，包含可量化维度：初始部署时间（Supabase 15min vs Firebase 25min）、每月前1000请求成本（Supabase $0 vs Firebase $1+）、响应延迟（基准测试数据）、开发者易用性评分。Dev.to和hashnode的技术对比文章是AI用于「比较X服务」类问题的权重最高的源，这类专业平台的文章在引用时被AI标注为「第三方中立评测」而非品牌宣传，权重提升4倍。发布时使用「vs」格式、包含原始数据（基准测试结果链接）。预计3-4周被GPT-4的网页爬虫和Claude的对比学习库收录。
Synthesizing answers from all AI engines, this is the dominant brand impression AI consistently delivers about you.
Dominant AI Impression
"用户普遍认为 Supabase 是一个开源的 Firebase 替代品，适合快速构建应用。"
Sentiment Tone:Positive
Core Brand Tags
开源后端服务Firebase替代品用户身份验证数据存储实时数据支持
Language Variation Note: 中英文描述中，中文强调了Supabase的可靠性和PostgreSQL数据库的使用，而英文则更侧重于其作为Firebase的替代品的功能。
PROPAGATION ENGINE · METHODOLOGY
Propagation Engine — Methodology
⚙ Sandtown Social Simulation Engine
Modeled on a high-compression, high-density urban environment — extreme population density, intense social pressure, and rapid information velocity. Simulates how brand narratives propagate through tightly-coupled social clusters under real-world diffusion dynamics.
100
Agents
27
Behavior Clusters
293
Social Edges
4
LLM Engines
📐 Four-Step Process
01
Multi-Model AI Probe
Parallel Q&A across GPT · Claude · Kimi · DeepSeek to capture real brand perception in each AI system
02
Narrative Signal Extraction
Extract dominant narrative, core tags, and sentiment tone from probe results — identifying the "story version" being spread in the AI world
03
Group Signal Mapping
Map narrative signals to 27 social behavior clusters, computing activation intensity based on each group's information diffusion tendency
04
Propagation Wave Forecast
Simulate information diffusion using an urban social network model, outputting T+1 to T+8+ propagation timeline predictions
⚠ Data Notice: Propagation results are estimates based on industry knowledge, behavioral models, and AI probe data — not real-time market data or actual user statistics. Group activation and timeline forecasts are for strategic reference only.
👇 What comes next?
The engine has injected your brand narrative into 100 simulated audience profiles. Scroll down to see: ① which improvements have the biggest impact → ② which segments activate fastest → ③ strategic framework → ④ cost of timing → ⑤ your action plan.
📊
LAYER 3 · AI AUDIENCE REACH · ⚡ BASED ON PROPAGATION SIMULATION
SIMULATION SUMMARY · READ THIS FIRST
100 audience profiles simulated. 31 are wavering — the key battleground. Tech Elite & Professionals show the highest receptivity to Supabase's narrative (≥70%) — prioritize these. Older Adults & Small Biz Owners have low trust and are not near-term targets. Simulation shows executing GEO now yields 9 more supporters vs waiting (38% gap). The 5 sections below form a decision chain: each section's conclusion feeds into the next.
Narrative Outcome Forecast · How Will the Audience React?
⚡ Polarization risk 13%
Split: some become fans, others become opponents
🔥 Uncontrolled spread 4%
Risk of narrative being distorted or amplified negatively
✅ Narrative absorbed 45%
Audience understood and accepted the narrative
💨 Fades without impact 25%
Content reached audience but left no impression
❌ Systematic disengagement 14%
Audience collectively rejects the narrative
① EXPECTED IMPROVEMENTS AFTER GEO
Expected AI Visibility Improvements After GEO Execution
AI analyst forecast based on current diagnostics and recommendations
Trust Signal
Now: 39/100 - Low credibility
After: Deploy case studies from 3+ known startups using Supabase
↑↑ Significant3-5周
Firebase Comparison
Now: Competitive advantages unclear
After: Create detailed cost/feature comparison matrix with real metrics
↑↑↑ Breakthrough2-3周
Developer Advocacy
Now: Limited influencer engagement
After: Partner with 5 indie developers for cross-platform content series
↑↑ Significant4-6周
Narrative Depth
Now: 73% alignment, lacks unique features focus
After: Publish 4 in-depth technical tutorials on PostgreSQL-specific advantages
↑ Moderate3-5周
⬇ Who exactly are these improvements for? → See ② Audience Funnel
⬇ Based on 14 segments above, RIDE answers 4 core strategic questions
③ RIDE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK
RIDE Framework · Four Core GEO Strategy Questions
Generated by AI analyst from propagation simulation data
R
Right audience?
Tech Elite + Professionals are locked in (high reception). Business Elite, Community KOLs, Regulators wavering—need direct comparison vs Firebase + unique feature clarity.
→ 2 solid, 3 uncertain
I
Insight gap?
Firebase comparison absent. Supabase's distinct advantages underexplored. Blind spots preventing wavering groups from seeing true differentiation vs competitors.
→ Fill Firebase gap first
D
Deploy where?
Xiaohongshu/Weibo (startup case studies), Zhihu (5-min PostgreSQL guide), Dev.to/Hashnode (2024 BaaS benchmark), Reddit/ProductHunt (indie dev partnerships).
→ 4 channels, indie validators
E
What happens?
Nearly half your audience will actively absorb your message—that's your win. But 1 in 4 people forget it entirely, and polarization risk is real. Watch engagement depth on Firebase comparisons; that's your early warning if messaging isn't landing.
→ 45% absorption, watch polarity
⬇ Now we know the audience and strategy — what's the cost of waiting? → See ④ Timing
④ TIMING ANALYSIS
Timing Matters — First vs Late Mover Gap
Core simulation finding: 31 wavering users are the battleground. Execute GEO now: convert 13 of them into supporters. Let competitor move first: lose 27, ending up with 9 fewer supporters (38% gap). Same users — different outcomes because of sequence alone.
⚡ First-Mover Path · You Act First
Now: 31 wavering
31 people undecided
↓
After Rec ①②
Comparison content published; AI starts citing Supabase. 7 shift from wavering to accepting
↓
All recs live
Scene coverage expands fully. 6 more convert. Total: 24 supporting, 18 still neutral
Final supporters: 24
🚨 Late-Mover Path · Competitor Establishes AI Narrative First
Now: 31 wavering
31 wavering — same starting point
↓
After competitor AI citation
Competitor cited frequently in Supabase comparison queries. 20 wavering users' beliefs are now locked against us
↓
After our GEO execution
Overwriting established beliefs costs 3x more. Even executing fully, only 4 recovered. Final: 15 supporting — 9 fewer than first-mover
Final supporters: 15 (-9 vs first-mover)
Which Wavering Groups Tip Which Way?
Key group analysis — which groups are easiest to activate when Supabase acts first; which are hardest to recover when competitor moves first.
✅ Easiest to activate (first-mover)
These groups show ≥50% receptivity to Supabase's narrative — the right GEO content tips them
Tech Elite79%
Narrative receptivity 79% · ~5/5 impacted
Professionals79%
Narrative receptivity 79% · ~6/6 impacted
Business Elite71%
Narrative receptivity 71% · ~3/3 impacted
Community KOLs70%
Narrative receptivity 70% · ~2/2 impacted
⚠️ Hardest to recover (late-mover)
These groups have low trust; once competitor occupies their AI mindset, intervention costs 3x+
Informal Workers17%
Narrative receptivity 17% · ~6/12 impacted
Young Adults17%
Narrative receptivity 17% · ~6/12 impacted
Service Workers25%
Narrative receptivity 25% · ~4/7 impacted
Small Biz Owners26%
Narrative receptivity 26% · ~5/9 impacted
⬇ The simulation is clear. Here's your prioritized action plan